PROMISES

Having been ‘overseas’ for a few weeks I returned to a sack-full of leaflets promising me all sorts of reasons to cast my vote this way and that – ironic really, seeing as how I were robbed of my vote [See previous Posts].

Ruth Davidson (MSP) was so obsessed by Nicola Sturgeon that her leaflet had Nicola’s name write large all over it (larger than Ruth’s, and over a dozen times more than the Conservative MEPs we were to vote for!). Davidson’s tactics haven’t changed and she, once again, tried to make it about Scottish Independence, shouting, ‘NO MORE REFERENDUMS’. Yes, well it was your party that got us into this mess Ruth, with a REFERENDUM – they didn’t do well (1 MEP).

Change UK told us that, ‘Brexit is a mess …’ and that they were for a People’s Vote, for the NHS, for free movement of people, for rigorous climate change targets. Fair enough, but in a single issue election (and for a new party launching during this single issue debate) maybe they should have picked a more focused party name – they didn’t do very well.

The Scottish Green party wanted us to choose ‘Hope over Hate’, and insisted that ‘Brexit can be stopped’ – they never do very well.

UKIP were keen to tell me that the rest of ‘em have ‘betrayed’ me, and if I, ‘… want to leave the EU vote UKIP’ – they were cast to the political wilderness, apparently.

Scottish Labour wanted to offer me hope as well. They had a picture of that nice man Mr Corbyn on their leaflet. They say all the right things, but (and it’s a big butt up here) their recent record has been hopeless, they lack serious leadership north of the border, and Jezza is not really a fan of Scotland – they did badly.

The Brexit Party named themselves cleverly, took aim accurately, and stayed focused – they did well for a new party (1 MEP).

The Scottish Liberal Democrats seem to have turned it into a battle for, ‘the soul of our country’ (although I’m not sure it’s the country I live in). Their leader wrote directly to me and they seem to have sent out the most mail – they did reasonably well (1 MEP).

The SNP delivered a couple of unambiguous, well focused, leaflets – they did very well (3 MEPs).

Over all (in UK) it seems to have been a disaster for the Tories (requiring a change of leadership) and a success for the new Brexit mob – entirely predictable. I’m not sure my vote (if I had been able to vote) would have made any difference. But I’m also not sure we are much further forward.

When I left for the land of Coke and Cola I left a land of, ‘promises broken, leave dates passed, rushed elections … resignations, acrimony and peevishness.’

Having spent months watching Westminster grind to a halt over Brexit we now get to watch the battle for the leadership of the conservative party. So, not much will get done until that is snorted (sorry, I meant ‘sorted’).

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

PART TWO; POST TRANSATLANTIC INTERLUDE POST

Time spent travelling is never wasted

I have been over in America for a few weeks. They know of our predicament – most people I spoke to had an opinion. However, the media over there are obsessed with their own problems. America starts on its eastern seaboard and ends in the pacific. The UK is where queens and princesses stay in castles, and it’s the land of every white American’s ancestors!

When I left for the land of Coke and Cola I left a land of, ‘promises broken, leave dates passed, rushed elections (giving some folk little time to react), resignations, acrimony and peevishness.’

I heard very little actual News about Brexit whilst away, but have returned to find that not much has changed. The impasse is still unpassed, the renegotiations were never negotiated, and the much anticipated ‘working together to find a compromise position’ ended in confusion.

But don’t worry, my little European chums, I reassured you last time.
One thing that is about to change is the leadership of the conservative party (and thus, the prime minister).

So, where do I go from Here?

The next few weeks will be dominated by the ongoing Tory leadership process – an unedifying display of smash and grab, winner takes-all, dirty politics. It will, no doubt, be decided on the basis of each candidates position on Brexit, and the Conservatives ongoing nervousness about the challenge posed by Nigel Farage and, the lesser threat of Jeremy Corbyn. My money has been on the other Jeremy (the Hunt) for a while now. But, it could be Boris or Gove I suppose. Whoever wins will be elevated to primacy for the wrong reasons and will be too preoccupied with the ongoing dismantling of a once fine country to be worried about the sort of issues that are uppermost in the ordinary citizens lives. That, these days, is the political landscape we find ourselves in.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

AIRPORTS & AIRLINES


 

Airports:

I have been through a lot of airports. I’ve never met anyone who  likes them. Add in the extra challenges of negotiating the various frustrations with of a Visual Disability and it can be a nightmare – it shouldn’t be.

Whilst I accept that my experiences might be different to other users, I am beginning to store up quite a collection of negative anecdotes. Here are some highlights.

The worst airport in America?:

I’ve had the misfortune to pass through a number of American airports. Two spring to mind as candidates for this award – San Francisco International and Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International.

The problem in San Francisco was primarily one of ‘lack of resources’. Susan and I waited for over two hours for assistance resulting in a very stressful last minute dash to the departure gate – I was told the wait would be half an hour. When I complained I was told that it wasn’t the airline’s fault that the airport was under resourced. I’m not sure I find this a convincing argument as it is the airline’s business model to contract-out the assistance. We always tip the person who pushes Susan through these airports (sometimes it involves more than one tip) and it feels like we are actually paying for a poor service!

Leaving San Francisco, May 2018

Atlanta was a series of difficult encounters (it is a huge airport). The person who was assisting us clearly found it amusing to ‘play’ with my limited vision. He seemed to be entertained by the fact that sometimes I saw that he was handing me back my passport/ticket and would ‘test’ me by holding them at different distances and angles. I get this quite a lot – passport control officers (clearly aware my white cane) will hand me back my passport in a manner that forces Susan to intervene. American border control are the worst; a British official at London’s Heathrow (realising her error) actually apologised for expecting me to know she was handing me back my passport.

Washington’s Ronald Reagan International airport excelled itself (not!) when the person assisting us grabbed the end of my white cane a couple of times in an attempt to ‘point’ me in the right direction!

It’s a tricky one this. I think I can point to a negative experience for every airport I’ve passed through recently. But I’m going to give the honours to … Atlanta. The airport is vast, the people assisting us were rude (they changed the departure gate three times and made us feel like it was our fault), and there is very little sign that they have made any effort to help people with disabilities..

Illustrative anecdote:

BA Check-in person (JFK, New York): ‘How many bags are you checking in?’

Me: ‘Two’

JFK person: ‘Please put them on the conveyor.’

Susan: ‘My husband doesn’t see. You need to take this into account’

JFK person: ‘Oh, I wondered about that. I was thinking how can a blind man managing to hand passports to me, and put the bags up.’

Susan: ‘He IS registered blind. Legally blind you know!’

Me: ‘I have a little bit of vision left.’

JFK person: ‘Oh, so your partially sighted.’

Susan: ‘No! He is legally, and technically, blind’

By this stage Susan is getting a bit annoyed. And the BA check-in person is starting to realise she may not have been as tactful as she would have wished.

JFK person: ‘I’ve called for assistance. Oh, here she comes now. I wouldn’t be able to see her coming if it wasn’t for my glasses …’

Me: ‘Yes, wonderful things, glasses.’

JFK person: ‘So, how did you become blind, what is it, erm, when did you start losing your sight. I mean is it getting worse? I just want to learn, you know.’

Me: ‘It’s genetic, and degenerative.’

The check-in lady continued to babble as she continued to dig her self into a hole and we tried to get our journey through the airport under way.

I did actually feel quite sorry for her. She clearly realised that she had said the wrong thing, and didn’t know how to recover. But she was trying to make up for her initial clumsiness.

I find that the encounters I have in these situations are so random that it is clear there is no training involved. Most people don’t know how to deal with disability. I’m quite sure that this person will think before she opens her mouth next time, and our little encounter will have taught her that there are degrees of disability.

Is Heathrow getting better?:

I accept that some British airports are starting to take this issue seriously. Because we live in Scotland and like to fly British Airways (if we can) we go through London’s Heathrow International airport quite often. It is, in my opinion, getting better. However, it is still unnecessarily stressful.

Airlines:

When you travel by plane you can’t avoid airports and airports are the main problem. But all airlines aren’t created equal. The crews on British Airways flights get my vote as the best trained. On some airlines you are ignored, on others they make too much of a fuss, but BA crew are calm, polite, and discreet.

I’m beginning to realise why I don’t see many other people with disabilities on aeroplanes, or in airports. I see lots of elderly folk who require assistance, but I don’t see a lot of white canes (or dogs – are guide dogs allowed?). I’m of the strong opinion that most of the barriers are socioeconomic. I feel another Post coming up – I will have a think, and return with a Post about the barriers to access, sometime soon.

Meanwhile, don’t give up, be quick to explain and slow to complain.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

USA 2019: GENERAL ISSUES

Airports:

I have been through a lot of airports. No one in their right mind likes modern air travel, but doing it with the limitations of a Visual Disability is a nightmare – but it shouldn’t be this way. In fact, I have had so many difficult encounters that I am going to put this in a separate Post.

Museums:

Whilst I accept that the average museum is not designed for visually disabled visitors, there are some that have made more of an effort than others.

The Country Music Hall of Fame and Museum in Nashville is not one of them. As I am now learning, a bit of pre-planning is a good idea. I had been before (in 2015) and felt I would remember the lay-out of the building but I checked to see if they did Audio Described tours, they said they did. Well, perhaps it’s a matter of definition but, in my opinion, they don’t!

The museum usually has a feature exhibition on the top floor, and this was what I was most interested in (it was all about Emmylou Harris). When I managed to find this section I asked anyone who would listen to me if they could tell me what number to press on the audio device I had picked up in the lobby (by the ticket booths). No-one knew what I was talking about, ‘You know,’ I pleaded, ‘the number printed on the display cabinets to tell me what to enter into my audio guide.’ It turns out that the featured exhibition doesn’t have audio description. I couldn’t find any staff member to seek assistance from so I went to the main (permanent) part of the museum – it’s a very big museum. The display cases in this (very dark and confusing) section had Audio Guide numbers on them, however the content was so general that I can’t imagine any country music fans that don’t know this stuff already.

I soon gave up and attempted to find my way back to the front desk where I had left Susan sitting reading her Kindle – it is too big a museum for her. It took me ages to find my way out – the lighting was dreadful, signage totally inadequate, and there was no-one around to ask for help.

It was a very dispiriting experience – which had started with an encounter with a very rude server in the café. I don’t normally complain but thought they might appreciate some constructive feedback, so I went to the main desk in the lobby. I was told that they don’t do Audio descriptions for temporary displays (bear in mind that these featured exhibitions are in place for years and that the Queens Gallery in Edinburgh, which changes it’s exhibition four times a year, does provide an audio guide). I was also informed that most of their ‘guests’ don’t demand detail in the audio guide content. All this with a big smile and a ‘have a nice day’ – I hold out little hope that my feedback will make it a better experience for future visitors.
Should I give up on museums?

Visitor attractions:

When you travel to different cities most of them provide experiences that are designed to give you an insight into the history or culture of the place – or are visitor attractions just designed as cash generating systems, cynically whisking the lazy tourist round the main sights!

I like to think that I have learned much from museums and other attractions, things it would have taken me much longer to find out on my own. However, I now have different challenges and I’m not alone.

I’m beginning to see why I don’t spot many other people with disabilities at these venues.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

WASHINGTON, DC & NEW YORK: USA 2019

Washington DC:

I had never been to the capital before. So, we decided to do the Hop-on, Hop-off Big bus as a way of checking the general layout. The main attractions are museums and monumental statues – I will express my views on the VI museum experience elsewhere. These famous attractions (The White House, Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial etcetera) are very spread out and, well, monumental.

I’m sorry to say that we gave up.

I give up and have lunch beside the river.

I’m sure they were better staffed and adapted than elsewhere as this is a showcase city and there is money around and if I were to come back I would select one of the main attractions and give it a go; but not this time.

We liked the Georgetown area as it was easier to get about (more European in scale), the taxis were easy to hail and the drivers all had interesting views on their adopted country and weren’t slow to express them!

An illustrative incident:

I found myself tapping my way round a fountain by a collection of restaurants and cafes on the Potomac riverside. A gentleman asked me if I needed help, I said I was fine and thanked him for his concern. But he persisted,

‘Are you looking for somewhere to eat?’ he asked.

‘No,’ I replied. ‘I can see you have plenty of choices. I was just out for a walk.’

‘Oh!’ he said, ‘I thought you were blind.’

By the time I had thought of a suitable repost (one that might educate him and amuse me) he had gone.

New York:

This was my 4th visit to this amazing city. I already knew what a challenge Midtown would present to both of us, so we were based in (low rise) Greenwich Village, beside Washington Square.

What can I say about this place that will help you, dear reader? Don’t go … bring plenty of money (especially smaller bills) … stay away from the main tourist attractions …

None of this is either encouraging or helpful (two of my reasons for this Blog – the third is to demonstrate useful ways we can make the world a less challenging place for me).

The New York streets are merciless, everyone is very tense, it’s very busy. But, dig down and you will find quiet streets, warm hearted people, and lots to keep you entertained.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather